Proactive Approach to Protect Livestock Transport in Missouri

Missouri recently approved a bill that significantly increases penalties for interfering with livestock transport, making it a Class E felony for offenders. The bill, sponsored by Republican Rep. Brenda Shields, aims to address concerns related to public safety, animal welfare, and food quality.

Previously, instances of obstruction in the state resulted in minor charges with a maximum fine of $1,000. This was seen as not enough to discourage potential interference. The new law is designed to take a more proactive approach in safeguarding the state's food delivery system and livestock transportation.

The law targets various actions that can impede livestock transport, including intentionally stopping a vehicle, disturbing confined livestock, causing delays, or harming the animals' health or usability by placing substances on them. Repeat offenders may face Class C felony charges, escalating the severity of the penalties.

The Missouri Cattlemen's Association supported the bill, expressing concern over potential delays in livestock transportation and its impact on animal health. Livestock trucks are designed to ensure the animals' well-being during transportation, but disruptions can lead to stress, overheating, and even death.

Rep. Brenda Shields explained that the legislation is crucial for public safety, as large trucks can obstruct visibility, and protesters have been known to throw items into the vehicles, risking serious accidents and injuries. The health and safety of animals are compromised during any disruption, and food quality may be compromised if the animals are mistreated.

The bill holds particular significance for St. Joseph, which houses Triumph Foods, a major pork producer that has faced previous protests by animal rights groups. Given the efforts to bolster the state's animal processing industry, concerns about potential protests have been heightened.

Critics argue that the bill increases penalties for obstructing livestock transport while not imposing penalties for animal abuse. Supporters argue that the primary focus is on safeguarding the food delivery system and ensuring animal welfare during transportation.
 

Photo Credit: istock-stefonlinton